23 July 2024 AD

St. Bridget of Sweden 1373 AD; St. Apollinaris of Ravenna 1^st century AD; St. Liborius 4^th century AD

There will be seven articles in this series. Calculation of the g-factors of electron, proton, neutron, and muon, and g-2 factors of electron, muon, and tau particles. All calculations will involve transcendental constants and integers, such as 10 and powers of 10 to shift the decimal point of a constant to the left or right and some other integers and fractions. The fractions will have, in denominators 2, 3, 4, etc., values resembling values used in quantum physics.

The g-factor Wikipedia article   >>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_(physics)

The g-2 factor Wikipedia article   >>>    

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalous_magnetic_dipole_moment

Now, transcendental constants will come from two sources. The first is taken from the very definition of a transcendental function.

Link to the post about the transcendental function   >>>  

https://luxdeluce.com/15-new-version-book-1.html

Links to the tables of the transcendental function   >>>  

https://luxdeluce.com/37-book-4a-table-of-transcendental-constants-going-down.html

https://luxdeluce.com/38-book-4b-updated-table-of-transcendental-constants-going-up.html

These are the basic constants, such as π = C₈, e = C₇, C₀, C₁₆ and their combinations π/e, etc. All other constants come from the recently posted multiplication/division tables and summation/subtraction tables. The precision of these calculations is good. I am using an HP Prime calculator with the precision of up to 12 significant digits, which is most of the time enough. Once I code the FORTRAN programs the precision will be ‘double’, that is, about 15 figures or ‘quad’ that is, over 30 figures. However, if 12 significant digits give precise results, so will ‘double’ or ‘quad’ precision.

I will start with the g-2 tau factor, which is the easiest to do. In each calculation, there will be a correction factor that is the power of 1 + some tiny values, such as the 1 millionth or so. This is necessary to obtain exact results. If the exponent is even 1.0 the results are off. If transcendental constants would be treated as variables (which is possible), what happens to the superposition principle that requires all exponents to be equal to 1.0, even? I will come back to this question later and try to answer, once the calculations are done.

After that, I will go to quite interesting mathematics with sequences and spirals Fibonacci-like, generalization of this type sequences, including fractional sequences (for example, fractional Fibonacci). It is going to be another long series of interesting articles.

One more thing – calculations using transcendental constants eliminate the need for physics formulas; I mean they are super-important but constants contain somehow those formulas inside of them. So, one may say that mathematics is much superior to the physics laws, which is nothing new under the Sun. This fact is just the first time this has been seen, as far as I know. It will be obvious to you once you see the examples.

TOOL – Reflection   >>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MzVuHqsNoM

Holy Face-unframed from Veronica's Sudarium ~ Basilica St. Peter, Vatican, 1879: